Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
Moderator: Harold_V
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
Picture test. I resized to a lower resolution
- Attachments
-
- ChassisR.jpg (60.11 KiB) Viewed 980 times
Last edited by Odyknuck on Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:53 am, edited 6 times in total.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
Perhaps you now understand what I've been trying to say. Well done!
H
H
Wise people talk because they have something to say. Fools talk because they have to say something.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
Yes, I understood however just now got the opportunity to experiment.
The above pic was originally at 4032 X 3024 3.7MB
So, either the original software resized the pics during upload or had a higher max Megabyte.
The above pic was originally at 4032 X 3024 3.7MB
So, either the original software resized the pics during upload or had a higher max Megabyte.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
So, In the above Pic the chassis is upright for hopefully the last time. I completed the Brake system that now has plenty of clearance below the Linkage, Cylinder and Fulcrum pivot. 3/4" on both, so I am pleased.
- Attachments
-
- CylinderPaintedandMountedR.jpg (158.37 KiB) Viewed 979 times
-
- FulcrumAllenClearenceR.jpg (97.24 KiB) Viewed 978 times
-
- PilotyTruckPivotLatchR.jpg (132.84 KiB) Viewed 977 times
Last edited by Odyknuck on Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:02 am, edited 4 times in total.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
I do NOT manage the software, although through the kindness of the owner, I certainly could. He trusts that I don't, and I do NOTHING to betray that trust.
That said, yes, the old software appeared to accept images that were larger than the board displayed, in spite of the fact that we made it clear that images larger than 1024 x 768 should NOT be uploaded. I suspect that that is no longer the case. If for no other reason, those large files eat up storage space unnecessarily, which would lead to increased cost for the owner. It is important that you, and all readers, understand that this board is a gift to you from him. He foots all costs and asks nothing in return (although he is grateful for those who make contributions).
It is incumbent upon all of us to ensure that we do not make him sorry for his generosity by ignoring rules that help control his expenses.
Newer monitors are far more forgiving of oversized images, but in the old days, any image posted that was larger than 1024 pixels in width caused the text to spread. All posts in any given thread that contained such an oversized image suffered the same fate. Imagine how much spread there would be if an image the width you described (4032 pixels) was allowed. I recall one that was just over 3,000 pixels and it was a total disaster until I resized the image. That's when we started enforcing image limits, and they should still be upheld.
Here's the hard facts on this matter.
With rare exception, an image sized to 1024 (in width) is large enough to display critical detail. Any larger is simply not needed.
File size of as little as 100 kb will display unreasonably good detail, although a larger file size may improve detail somewhat. A top limit of 500 kb is NOT unreasonable, and, certainly, 200 kb is generally more than would be required for a good image. Please think accordingly when posting images so we can all keep this incredibly valuable venue open for us without advertising or other expense.
H
That said, yes, the old software appeared to accept images that were larger than the board displayed, in spite of the fact that we made it clear that images larger than 1024 x 768 should NOT be uploaded. I suspect that that is no longer the case. If for no other reason, those large files eat up storage space unnecessarily, which would lead to increased cost for the owner. It is important that you, and all readers, understand that this board is a gift to you from him. He foots all costs and asks nothing in return (although he is grateful for those who make contributions).
It is incumbent upon all of us to ensure that we do not make him sorry for his generosity by ignoring rules that help control his expenses.
Newer monitors are far more forgiving of oversized images, but in the old days, any image posted that was larger than 1024 pixels in width caused the text to spread. All posts in any given thread that contained such an oversized image suffered the same fate. Imagine how much spread there would be if an image the width you described (4032 pixels) was allowed. I recall one that was just over 3,000 pixels and it was a total disaster until I resized the image. That's when we started enforcing image limits, and they should still be upheld.
Here's the hard facts on this matter.
With rare exception, an image sized to 1024 (in width) is large enough to display critical detail. Any larger is simply not needed.
File size of as little as 100 kb will display unreasonably good detail, although a larger file size may improve detail somewhat. A top limit of 500 kb is NOT unreasonable, and, certainly, 200 kb is generally more than would be required for a good image. Please think accordingly when posting images so we can all keep this incredibly valuable venue open for us without advertising or other expense.
H
Wise people talk because they have something to say. Fools talk because they have to say something.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
I worked on the Pilot Truck after getting it painted up. I had to clean up the face of the Pivot point where I welded it up awhile back. I used a boring bar upside down and ran the Lathe in reverse to get it done. Unfortunately, I broke a bolt and the assembly got put on hold until tomorrow.
- Attachments
-
- PilotTruckPaintedR.jpg (177.11 KiB) Viewed 976 times
-
- PilotTruckPivotFacingR.jpg (103.78 KiB) Viewed 975 times
Last edited by Odyknuck on Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
With the Frame Upright I wanted to start on the Cylinders however I discovered only 6 of 7 Mounting holes were drilled on one side. The OP apparently broke a drill bit off in a hole he started and moved on. I was able to get the drill bit out and finish the hole from the outside. He also did not drill the hole in the Cylinder center section, so I used a 1/4 - 20 Screw in transfer punch to locate the hole. These things have come in handle many times over the years.
- Attachments
-
- CylinderTGrabnsferPunchResized.jpg (384.45 KiB) Viewed 1065 times
-
- CylinderPunchedResized.jpg (288.29 KiB) Viewed 1065 times
-
- FraneDrillingResized.jpg (397.93 KiB) Viewed 1065 times
-
- CylinderBoltsResized.jpg (270.57 KiB) Viewed 1064 times
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
Harold,
I totally understand and will observe the Pic size in the future and keep them on the smaller size. In all honestly when the pics loaded, I assumed everything was Ok and did not give it much thought, for that I apologize.
I totally understand and will observe the Pic size in the future and keep them on the smaller size. In all honestly when the pics loaded, I assumed everything was Ok and did not give it much thought, for that I apologize.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
Harold, I went back thru all of the Pics in my Build Log and the average size is 125 KB up until I tried to upload Pics yesterday.
- Bill Shields
- Posts: 10459
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
- Location: 39.367, -75.765
- Contact:
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
If I seem to remember, there used to be a pixel limit, irrespective of file size. I think it was 800 x 600
Is that the way it is now?
I am a bit confused as to current limits ..file size or pixels?
Is that the way it is now?
I am a bit confused as to current limits ..file size or pixels?
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
- Bill Shields
- Posts: 10459
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
- Location: 39.367, -75.765
- Contact:
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
Odyknuck
You have certainly stepped up your game regarding clearance improvement. You do nice work.
I cannot say that given my personal choice, I would not use E clips on pins since I have seen cases where they have disappeared from where they were intended to be located.
When I was young, we used to call them "Jesus clips"
You have certainly stepped up your game regarding clearance improvement. You do nice work.
I cannot say that given my personal choice, I would not use E clips on pins since I have seen cases where they have disappeared from where they were intended to be located.
When I was young, we used to call them "Jesus clips"
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
Re: Railroad Warehouse 2.8.2 Mikado Logger Build
It's been years since such small pictures were required. The advent of faster modems made that possible.Bill Shields wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 11:30 pm If I seem to remember, there used to be a pixel limit, irrespective of file size. I think it was 800 x 600
Is that the way it is now?
Both, really, although if you observe the maximum of 1024 x 768 (the 768 can also be 1024---that doesn't spread text). Large pictures (pixel count) spread text and cause readers to have to scroll to read the contents of every post on the page on which oversized pictures are displayed. Oversized file sizes eat up valuable server space and will cause the owner to have to buy greater space on a server, raising his costs of maintaining the board. When large file sizes are not required, don't post 'em that way. You'll come to discover that a 1024 x 768 image recorded @ 200 kb or less offers incredibly good definition, assuming it's taken in focus.I am a bit confused as to current limits ..file size or pixels?
If you're looking for high detail for a specific reason and a larger image recorded with more information may be required, but when a reader posts a nonsense image of something irrelevant and doesn't pay attention to those features, it's only a matter of time until we either start paying for this venue, or it is loaded with advertising (have any of the readers taken notice that this board is free of advertising?) Worst case scenario, the board is simply taken away.
We all need to do our part in keeping this venue reasonable for the owner.
H
Wise people talk because they have something to say. Fools talk because they have to say something.