3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Where users can chronicle their builds. Start one thread and continue to add on to it.

Moderator: Harold_V

Andy R
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: So. Calif.

Re: Would it have been possible to turn the compound

Post by Andy R »

Harold,
You asked: "Would it have been possible to turn the compound...?" Well, yes and no. I did try rotating the compound as you suggested but the geometry would have still required the compound to clear the casting. I even considered trying a tool held in a boring bar to cut the slot, but still had inadequate clearance.
Thanks for your thoughts. The best part about making this stuff is figuring how to, and not necessarily actually making the parts ... which just confirms that the method works.
I have been struggling with workholding on another pair of parts and should the umpeenth attempt be successful it will be documented in this build.
Regards,
Andy
User avatar
Harold_V
Posts: 20231
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:02 pm
Location: Onalaska, WA USA

Re: 3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Post by Harold_V »

Andy,
I've faced those exact problems over the years. Doesn't seem to matter the size of the machine, there's often a job that is a little larger than the machine can accommodate.

Continued success with your project!

H
Wise people talk because they have something to say. Fools talk because they have to say something.
User avatar
Bill Shields
Posts: 10459
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
Location: 39.367, -75.765
Contact:

Re: 3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Post by Bill Shields »

first law of purchasing a machine tool:

"10 minutes after you have commissioned a new machine that will handle the largest job that you have ever done...."
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
Andy R
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: So. Calif.

Leading (Coupled) Rods, Patt. #512 Part of Ass'y #2131

Post by Andy R »

IMG_4458s.jpg
Still having fun with the rods.

I purchased a 0.6255 reamer, but failed to check the shaft diameter - which is larger than the nominal capacity of my chucks. The light bulb went on, and I mounted it as if it was a boring bar, at maximum extension, and all worked out well. Next will be the driver (main) rods, although the cylinders would make more sense first.
User avatar
JBodenmann
Posts: 3855
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: Tehachapi, California

Re: 3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Post by JBodenmann »

Beautiful! Nice work Andy
Jack
Andy R
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: So. Calif.

Main Rods, Patt. #511, Part #1131

Post by Andy R »

IMG_4465.jpg
Contrary to what Mr. Coventry's 1928 and 1958 drawings show, and what is not shown in the photos, is that the rods were milled on both sides.
The original plans show the [ shape but milling both sides results in an I shape, which is much more structurally stable. In this size it might not matter. But during a conversation with Jack Bodenmann he said that somebody would feel the other side of the rods and say: "OOOOH, You fluted both sides!" So that was enough encouragement. Actually, it was not much more effort, and I did all 6 of the rods that way.
Odyknuck
Posts: 813
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:21 pm
Location: Chardon, Ohio

Re: 3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Post by Odyknuck »

Milling the same material off both sides keeps them straight. Nice work.
Andy R
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: So. Calif.

Twelve tender wheels - Part #3137

Post by Andy R »

I purchased twelve cast-iron wheel castings from John Kurdzionak at Friends Models:
IMG_4466.jpg
Then a bit of time was spent machining them.
The 12-wheel tender of the P7d has the same diameter wheels as the pilot truck and the "Standard" 8-wheel tender used under the P7, P7a, etc., so the availability of castings was fortuitous.
IMG_4467.jpg
Pontiacguy1
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:15 am
Location: Tennessee, USA

Re: 3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Post by Pontiacguy1 »

That's a whole lot of work, right there.
User avatar
Greg_Lewis
Posts: 3014
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 2:44 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: 3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Post by Greg_Lewis »

Harold_V wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:35 pm Andy,
I've faced those exact problems over the years. Doesn't seem to matter the size of the machine, there's often a job that is a little larger than the machine can accommodate.

Continued success with your project!

H

I remember being in Chama many years ago and seeing a couple of guys attach a machine to the crankpin of one of the drivers of an engine they were working on to clean up the worn pin bearing surface. It was sort of like an outside boring machine. It dawned on me then that while we take parts to our machines, it is also possible to take the machine to the part. I used that lesson a couple of times, one hanging the boiler shell off the side of my mill table to cut the holes in the tube sheet, and another opening the window so a long workpiece could stick out into the side yard and still fit on the table. I should have already known this as long before that I had taken my Model A Ford to have the cylinders bored and the shop bolted a boring machine to the top of the block and did the job without taking the engine out of the car.
Greg Lewis, Prop.
Eyeball Engineering — Home of the dull toolbit.
Our motto: "That looks about right."
Celebrating 35 years of turning perfectly good metal into bits of useless scrap.
User avatar
Bill Shields
Posts: 10459
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
Location: 39.367, -75.765
Contact:

Re: 3/4-inch scale B&O P7d Cincinnatian

Post by Bill Shields »

General Electric field services has been doing a good job worldwide doing just what you describe.

Ever tried to move a steam turbine to the machine when the turbine is in xxxx and the mill in Schenectady?

Sometimes the lash-up looks tube Goldberg, but if it works...

Ever seen the rigs where they turn the flanges on locos while still under the loco?
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
Andy R
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: So. Calif.

Re: Portable milling machines

Post by Andy R »

If memory serves me right there were portable milling machines available - not in the sizes to machine a full-size turbine shaft, driver tire, or locomotive cylinder (I have seen photos of those) but in the size that would have made any home machinist envious. Maybe someday i will remember the name.

Thanks Pontiacguy1, Greg and Bill, for your comments and interest in this thread. I have been working on some of the motion work and will follow this with some related posts.

And yes, that dozen of wheels was a lot of work. Especially after i accidentally bumped the compound's handwheel and had to take a few more thousandths off the OD of the rest in order to make them all the same.
Post Reply