Chloe cylinder bore question

This forum is dedicated to the Live Steam Hobbyist Community.

Moderators: cbrew, Harold_V

Post Reply
User avatar
milwiron
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2020 1:52 pm
Location: Flanagan, IL.

Chloe cylinder bore question

Post by milwiron »

Back when I built my CP173 I found about half way through I wished I had started a Chloe instead... I just liked the looks. Almost 40 years later I'm finally finding the time for another build. After a stalled start a couple months ago due to some surgery it's time to make chips. Chloe went up on her wheels today.
Following suggestions on this forum I'll be going with a 6 inch boiler instead of the 5 inch pipe.
Should I bore the cylinders to 1.375 as Fitchburg builders have done instead of the stock 1.250? I'm certainly not much concerned about pulling power with this loco choice. Thanks much for any advice.
Denny
Chloe on wheels.jpg
"Measure twice, curse once."
Berkman
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:55 pm

Re: Chloe cylinder bore question

Post by Berkman »

In short yes, Also, I think a few others on this board had some comments on how to reduce wear/ prolong life of the Stephenson valve gear components, but I do not remember the particulars.

I'm sure others will chime in.
User avatar
Bill Shields
Posts: 10460
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
Location: 39.367, -75.765
Contact:

Re: Chloe cylinder bore question

Post by Bill Shields »

You can always sleeve them down..
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
FKreider
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 8:44 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Chloe cylinder bore question

Post by FKreider »

Go with the bigger bore.
-Frank K.
Pontiacguy1
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:15 am
Location: Tennessee, USA

Re: Chloe cylinder bore question

Post by Pontiacguy1 »

Absolutely go with the bigger bore. My chloe locomotive was built with the 1.25"x2.25" cylinders, a 6" steel boiler, solid steel frame, steel rods, steel front buffer beam, etc... in other words, it was made a lot heavier than the stock-built Chloe. This thing was a staller when it was first built. If it had a load that was too large, it would just keep getting slower and slower until it would just stop on the grade. Would rarely ever slip a wheel unless track conditions were less than ideal, i.e. wet. Bored it out and it is a much better performing locomotive. Actually, mine is bored to 1.5" bore. I wouldn't recommend that you do that on yours, 1.375" will do it. The 6" boiler will give you plenty of steam to run those larger cylinders.

If you are going to use the aluminum rods, aluminum parts, and try to make the locomotive light, then the 1.25" bore will do ok for that, and I would recommend you go with that. If you're going to try to make most of your stuff out of steel and make the locomotive heavier, absolutely use the bigger bore.

Hope this helps.
Post Reply