Smokebox Length Ratio
- Bill Shields
- Posts: 10464
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
- Location: 39.367, -75.765
- Contact:
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
4. Whatever looks good and will allow you to get your full size hands inside of a scale model smokebox to do assembly and maintenance work
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
Also involved in smokebox length is fuel used:
Coal required significant screens and baffles in the smokebox.
RussN
Coal required significant screens and baffles in the smokebox.
RussN
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:00 pm
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
Hello, These are all good answers, for those old time slide rule engineers somewhere in a book, I am sure there is a smokebox formula. As well I was under the impression that the early 1890 or 1900 locos with long smoke boxes were for burning wood as per Dan above with screens to catch ash and soot , they may have switched to coal later. The Screens in the smoke box helped the women on wash day too! Hanging hand scrubbed clothing on the wash line to dry, only a few had Maytag's back then... Happy Wife Happy Life
LOL Scotty
LOL Scotty
- Bill Shields
- Posts: 10464
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
- Location: 39.367, -75.765
- Contact:
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
If you stop and think about it.. what does the length of the smokebox have to do with anything except how much stuff you can cram in there?
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: No. Idaho
- Contact:
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
For a little perspective, here are some examples of tube lengths:
SP class A6 4-4-2 16 feet
SP Harriman 4-6-2 (classes P1 through P7) 20 feet
SP Cab forward classes AC4 through 12 22 feet
Keep in mind that the AC4 - 12 had combustion chambers.
The Atlantics had a 75" smokebox, and the Pacific classes P1-P5 had a 96" smokebox.
I would guess that the shorter smokebox on the Atlantic would be to get more tube length, as the length in front of the stack is the same. However it looks like the max tube length is 22 to 24 feet.
Regards,
Doug
SP class A6 4-4-2 16 feet
SP Harriman 4-6-2 (classes P1 through P7) 20 feet
SP Cab forward classes AC4 through 12 22 feet
Keep in mind that the AC4 - 12 had combustion chambers.
The Atlantics had a 75" smokebox, and the Pacific classes P1-P5 had a 96" smokebox.
I would guess that the shorter smokebox on the Atlantic would be to get more tube length, as the length in front of the stack is the same. However it looks like the max tube length is 22 to 24 feet.
Regards,
Doug
http://www.precisionlocomotivecastings.com/
Building a 70 ton Willamette in 1.6"
Building a 80 ton Climax in 1.6"
"Aim to improve!"
"Mine is not to question why, mine is just to tool and die"
Building a 70 ton Willamette in 1.6"
Building a 80 ton Climax in 1.6"
"Aim to improve!"
"Mine is not to question why, mine is just to tool and die"
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
Bigger is better. Contestant vacuum is better, abrupt changes/surges are bad (but unavoidable).
Thats what the builders decided, although its always a moving target. Space is always limited.
For a larger volume of smoke box, the vacuum (applied by the venturi, created by exhaust steam from the cylinders) is not as abrupt in its pressure changes as a smaller smoke box is.
So, a larger smoke box create a more stable vacuum on the fire, so it tears the fire less. A larger volume of smoke box vacuum can also pull a little longer as it pulls softer, all good for the fire.
Thats what the builders decided, although its always a moving target. Space is always limited.
For a larger volume of smoke box, the vacuum (applied by the venturi, created by exhaust steam from the cylinders) is not as abrupt in its pressure changes as a smaller smoke box is.
So, a larger smoke box create a more stable vacuum on the fire, so it tears the fire less. A larger volume of smoke box vacuum can also pull a little longer as it pulls softer, all good for the fire.
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
Interesting, thanks for the info!Loco112 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:24 am Bigger is better. Contestant vacuum is better, abrupt changes/surges are bad (but unavoidable).
Thats what the builders decided, although its always a moving target. Space is always limited.
For a larger volume of smoke box, the vacuum (applied by the venturi, created by exhaust steam from the cylinders) is not as abrupt in its pressure changes as a smaller smoke box is.
So, a larger smoke box create a more stable vacuum on the fire, so it tears the fire less. A larger volume of smoke box vacuum can also pull a little longer as it pulls softer, all good for the fire.
-Frank K.
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
I just received a good photo (below) of the Northern Pacific #666 American.
This Baldwin locomotive was delivered in 1887 and scrapped in 1947.
This 1930s image shows modernization with a steel cab and turbo-electric lighting.
A coal burner, it had an extended smokebox for the cinder screens. A good example of a more unusual smokebox design.
My friend is planning on modeling this locomotive in 7.5" gauge live steam, basing it on the Allen American.
The Allen's long boiler is correct for #666. He already has the castings and the boiler. 'Just needs the time.
RussN
This Baldwin locomotive was delivered in 1887 and scrapped in 1947.
This 1930s image shows modernization with a steel cab and turbo-electric lighting.
A coal burner, it had an extended smokebox for the cinder screens. A good example of a more unusual smokebox design.
My friend is planning on modeling this locomotive in 7.5" gauge live steam, basing it on the Allen American.
The Allen's long boiler is correct for #666. He already has the castings and the boiler. 'Just needs the time.
RussN
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
I came across this interesting drawing from the Baldwin Locomotive Works Engineering Department on standard practice for smokebox design. The drawing is dated 1947, so this is pretty much the final word from Baldwin on this subject. Although this is not to scale, notice how the cinders are directed to the front of the smokebox, where they would pile up there, and a longer smokebox would provide a place for them to accumulate.
Dan Watson
Chattanooga, TN
Chattanooga, TN
- Bill Shields
- Posts: 10464
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
- Location: 39.367, -75.765
- Contact:
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
Easier to clean with a shop vac
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
Re: Smokebox Length Ratio
Martin Evans and Greenly say little about the smokebox itself other than it be tight fitting. They talk mostly about the stack and blast nozzle.
Until the mid 1930's Purdue operated a locomotive test plant. A search of their library shows several articles on smokebox's and a dissertation from 1940 titled "Design of a Locomotive Smokebox Arrangement". You need a Purdue University account to view them online. Know any alumni or students? They can be viewed in person on a public computer at the library. The librarian said a inter-library loan might be available through your local library.
https://purdue-primo-prod.hosted.exlibr ... _entrys,lk
Until the mid 1930's Purdue operated a locomotive test plant. A search of their library shows several articles on smokebox's and a dissertation from 1940 titled "Design of a Locomotive Smokebox Arrangement". You need a Purdue University account to view them online. Know any alumni or students? They can be viewed in person on a public computer at the library. The librarian said a inter-library loan might be available through your local library.
https://purdue-primo-prod.hosted.exlibr ... _entrys,lk