blind driver

This forum is dedicated to the Live Steam Hobbyist Community.

Moderators: cbrew, Harold_V

hoppercar
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:09 pm

blind driver

Post by hoppercar »

had some damage done to the flange, on the second driver, of a mikado, when the drivers would lateral in the frame, for a curve..... the flange was rubbing, on a nut, that bolts the brake hanger bracket to the frame. nut, will be removed, hole countersunk for a flat head screw, and a nut put on inside of frame. first thought, was to replace wheel casting, ...then thought about tires,...but looking at it...i think my least amount of down time, would simply be, put the driver set between centers, then turn the flange off, and make it a blind set ?....this is the second set back from the cylinder block.
User avatar
NP317
Posts: 4589
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 2:57 pm
Location: Northern Oregon, USA

Re: blind driver

Post by NP317 »

Sounds feasible to have the 2nd driver set blind.

Certainly easier that trying to create systems and software for blind automobile drivers...
RN
Cary Stewart
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:54 pm

Re: blind driver

Post by Cary Stewart »

I believe that the blind drivers had the same tread taper as the flanged drivers. I believe that it helps centering.
Cary
User avatar
cbrew
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:17 pm
Location: Vancouver Wa

Re: blind driver

Post by cbrew »

is the flange damage on the back of the flange? if so, i would not worry about it and run it.
attached is the thread profile i used on my ten wheeler with a center blind drivers
img075.jpg
If it is not live steam. its not worth it.
hoppercar
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:09 pm

Re: blind driver

Post by hoppercar »

yes, the damage is to the back side of the flange, wear it was rubbing on a nut
STRR
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Westminster, CO

Re: blind driver

Post by STRR »

I agree with cbrew. If the damage is NOT affecting the operation, run it as it is. The only one who will know is you. If it IS affecting the operation, then I would machine the flange off as in cbrew's diagram and run it blind. Many locomotives had blind drivers for shorter radius curves.

Good Luck,
Terry
User avatar
cbrew
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:17 pm
Location: Vancouver Wa

Re: blind driver

Post by cbrew »

Being number 2 driver, i can not see it effecting anything, I had the rear driver rub on a boiler stay on the allen american when i broke a bolt on the front leaf spring, grinding the flange thin, it ran that way for 3 years before it was time to shoe the old gal.
I say run it, and when its time,, shoe them all
If it is not live steam. its not worth it.
User avatar
Fender
Posts: 3089
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga TN

Re: blind driver

Post by Fender »

I agree with running it as is. Another option besides a blind driver is to reduce the width and depth of the flange on the middle driver(s). This was sometimes done to increase the lateral motion on these drivers, yet retain some flange. There is a photo of such an arrangement in a book on Colorado narrow gauge, where the different flanges are clearly seen. Unfortunately, the loco has derailed and is laying on its side!
Dan Watson
Chattanooga, TN
User avatar
SZuiderveen
Posts: 530
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Baltimore

Re: blind driver

Post by SZuiderveen »

Fender wrote: Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:12 pm I agree with running it as is. Another option besides a blind driver is to reduce the width and depth of the flange on the middle driver(s). This was sometimes done to increase the lateral motion on these drivers, yet retain some flange. There is a photo of such an arrangement in a book on Colorado narrow gauge, where the different flanges are clearly seen. Unfortunately, the loco has derailed and is laying on its side!
#12 at Georgetown Loop has this arrangement
User avatar
Bill Shields
Posts: 10558
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:57 am
Location: 39.367, -75.765
Contact:

Re: blind driver

Post by Bill Shields »

This may seem obvious to some...but...

just be aware of the possibility of a standard width tire with no flange CAN fall inside a rail on a tight (loose) turn.

Many prototypes had 'wider than normal' tires where blind drivers were used...just to help prevent such an occurrence.
Too many things going on to bother listing them.
User avatar
NP317
Posts: 4589
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 2:57 pm
Location: Northern Oregon, USA

Re: blind driver

Post by NP317 »

Bill Shields wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:55 am [snip]

Many prototypes had 'wider than normal' tires where blind drivers were used...just to help prevent such an occurrence.
That is certainly the case with the full-sized logging locomotives I have operated.
RN
User avatar
cbrew
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:17 pm
Location: Vancouver Wa

Re: blind driver

Post by cbrew »

the extra "width" of the thread gained with the missing flange has proven to more then enough to run my ten wheeler around a 25 foot radius.
i wouldn't worry too much about that unless you plan on removing the flange on both middle axles.
If it is not live steam. its not worth it.
Post Reply